NHL draft week is officially upon us, marking the culmination of scouting efforts and the release of final prospect rankings. This comprehensive list dives deep into the top 64 prospects for the 2025 Upper Deck NHL Draft, providing detailed analysis, perceived strengths, areas for development, and professional projections based on extensive scouting opinions and intel.
While names like Matthew Schaefer and Michael Misa stand out at the very top, the 2025 draft class is widely characterized by a significant lack of consensus among teams and public scouts alike once you get past the initial few players. This makes predicting draft day even more intriguing, as different organizations prioritize varying attributes – be it skill, grit, size, or playoff performance – based on their specific needs and organizational philosophy. More so than in previous years, expect potential surprises and players sliding or rising depending on team-specific boards.
It’s important to remember that a player’s ultimate NHL success isn’t solely defined by their draft position. While early picks often receive more opportunities, history shows that hidden gems are consistently found later in the draft. Given the perceived premium placed on size, physical play, and “hard skill” in this class, there’s optimism that successful NHL players will emerge from beyond the first round.
The Coveted Top Tier: Schaefer, Misa, Hagens, and the Debate Below
The conversation for the top spot has centered around defenseman Matthew Schaefer and forward Michael Misa, with varying opinions emerging on who follows them in the elite group.
1. Matthew Schaefer, D, Erie (OHL): The consensus top defenseman and by many accounts the likely first overall pick. Described as a dynamic, true No. 1 cornerstone, Schaefer possesses size (6-foot-2), elite mobility, and high-end skating that allows him to shut down opponents and drive offense through quality transition play. While an injury limited his season to 26 games, his impact was undeniable, averaging over 25 minutes per game and consistently driving play. Scouts and executives view him as a foundational piece for a championship team, capable of controlling play, handling tough matchups, running a power play, and even wearing a letter. His package of tools, character, and leadership potential leads many to project him as a future top-10 NHL defender. Despite the limited sample size due to injury, his rare combination of attributes makes him a highly secure projection at the top.
2. Michael Misa, F, Saginaw (OHL): Granted exceptional status in 2022, Misa delivered an astounding offensive season in 2024-25, including a remarkable 62 goals and 134 points in the OHL – the most by a draft-eligible OHL player since Patrick Kane in 2006-07. He projects confidently as a top-line forward capable of consistently exceeding 90 points. Misa’s offensive instincts, high-level processing, and execution at top speed are elite. Many scouts believe he is NHL-ready, possessing the potential to become an elite top-line center. His ability to find soft areas, deliver in clutch moments, and blend high-end playmaking with goal-scoring makes him a constant offensive threat. His two-way game, particularly backchecking and defensive awareness, has improved noticeably. While some scouts note an occasional inconsistent compete level or lack of pure dynamism compared to Schaefer, his offensive production and overall skill package are undeniable, profiling him as a foundational player.
3. James Hagens, F, Boston College (NCAA): Initially viewed by some as the potential #1 prospect, Hagens is projected as a top-line or elite second-line center. He opts for a highly cerebral and efficient style, perhaps lacking Misa’s pure dynamism, but compensates with excellent speed, passing, and a strong work rate. Scouts are impressed by his professional details – puck support, winning battles, defensive play – which are expected to ease his transition to the NHL. While his offensive “gear” wasn’t always fully showcased in his first NCAA season after a dominant NTDP year, another season at Boston College is seen as beneficial for him to drive his own line and develop that dynamic element. Despite being smaller, his understanding of spacing, anticipation, transition play, and creativity have drawn comparisons to players like Clayton Keller and Jack Hughes. Some concerns exist regarding his tendency to defer or not consistently show his highest gear.
4. Porter Martone, F, Brampton (OHL): A big (6-foot-3, 207 pounds), cerebral forward, Martone is viewed as a dual-threat offensive player capable of both scoring and facilitating. He projects as a second-line scoring winger likely to see top power-play time. His competitive nature adds value, profiling him as an effective agitator once he hones his physicality. While his ability to score and make plays will challenge NHL defenders, concerns exist about his speed and skating posture. Although his speed improved this season, adding explosiveness is key to reaching his ceiling. Martone’s unique blend of size, skill, and competitive fire makes him a highly attractive prospect, with a legitimate chance to become a top-line winger if his skating progresses. Some views place him as high as #3 overall, seeing immense offensive potential, while others note frustrations with inconsistency.
Adding to the perspective on the top prospects, Matthew Schaefer, Michael Misa, James Hagens, and Jake O’Brien (ranked #9 overall) recently had the unique experience of attending Game 3 of the 2025 Stanley Cup Final. They met with stars like Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl, Sam Bennett, and Aaron Ekblad, gaining invaluable insight into the pinnacle of the sport. As Leon Draisaitl advised, the experience is about soaking it in and learning “what it’s all about and what it takes.” Sam Bennett added a crucial perspective for the young players: “Just enjoy the ride. It’s going to go way quicker than you’ll ever imagine.” This rare opportunity provided a firsthand look at the ultimate goal they are striving for.
Beyond the Top: A Wide Range of Opinions and Team Preferences
After the initial group, the rankings diverge significantly across scouting circles and team boards. This 2025 class is seen as particularly tricky to predict, with a perceived talent gap emerging after the top 10-13 players. The end of the first round, some suggest, resembles the early second round of stronger draft years.
Here’s a look at prospects ranked from 5 through 64, synthesizing insights from various sources to provide a more complete picture:
Prospects 5-10:
5. Anton Frondell, F, Djurgardens (Allsvenskan): A versatile two-way forward (C/RW), Frondell’s flexibility is highly attractive. He’s coming off a historically productive season for an under-18 player in Sweden’s second tier, outpacing future NHL stars like Nylander and Pastrnak at the same age in that league, giving him a confident projection as a first-line NHL forward. A cerebral player who attacks the middle, reads defensive coverage well, and shows translatable details like forechecking and high anticipation. He’s shown play-driving against men and impressed at the combine. While some view him as a potential top-two pick, others have concerns about consistency against his own age group or questions about his high-end offensive ceiling.
6. Roger McQueen, F, Brandon (WHL): Often described as a “unicorn” due to his 6-foot-5 frame combined with speed and mobility typically seen in smaller players. He profiles as a modern power forward blending soft skill and physicality. An elite right-handed center, his size and willingness to dictate play add value. He possesses professional defensive habits and unique offensive upside, though a back injury cost him significant time, raising his risk profile. He dominates the cycle and creates on the rush. While a confident projection as an elite top-line center is hindered by the injury, his combine performance proved health. He’s a high-risk, high-reward player with rare tools.
7. Caleb Desnoyers, F, Moncton (QMJHL): Widely praised as one of the best two-way players and a “coach’s dream.” He excels at taking assignments and executing consistently, making smart plays and providing a physical forecheck presence. Projects as a quality second-line center with first-line potential. He’s cerebral, with quick hands and playmaking, consistently effective without being flashy. Executives value his “reliable” nature; he performs best in pressure games and is seen as a future leader – “the type of player you win with.” Lofty comparisons to Bergeron and Toews highlight his high floor and translatable game, though some question if his high-end offensive upside matches others ranked alongside him. Some insiders view him as significantly underrated.
8. Jackson Smith, D, Tri-City (WHL): The consensus second-best defenseman in the draft. A big, physical defender (6-3) with untapped offensive ability. He possesses all the qualities of a top-four matchup defenseman, excelling in neutral zone transition defense by defending the rush, closing gaps, and steering play. His blend of skating, size, and poise suggests more offensive potential than shown, which playing at Penn State next season could unlock. While lacking explosive skating or consistent creativity, his reads make him a plus transition player. Development in preventing rush offense and consistent offensive threat could see him become a No. 2 defender. He’s viewed by some insiders as having a “no miss factor” despite decision-making concerns.
9. Jake O’Brien, F, Brantford (OHL): Deceptive and incredibly smooth, O’Brien projects as a point-producing, top-six center with a chance at the top line. He’s considered one of the best playmakers and arguably the best pure creator in the draft, regularly generating high-danger chances. He excels at manipulating defenders, distributing with ease, and using fakes. Development areas include simplifying plays to reduce turnovers and improving his shot to complement his passing. While slighter than some centers, he has room to grow. His elite playmaking will be more valuable with added speed and a shooting threat. He’s likely two or three years away but has the potential to be an elite power-play quarterback. His hands are noted as more agile than his feet.
10. Victor Eklund, F, Djurgardens (Allsvenskan): Projects as a top-six forward with top-line potential. Despite size concerns (5-11, 161 lbs), his game is very translatable, playing bigger than his measurements suggest with room to add strength. His production ranks sixth all-time among U19 forwards in the Allsvenskan. An aggressive, speedy, skilled winger, he attacks defenders fearlessly and protects the puck well using body positioning. His mature off-puck play earns coach trust quickly. His blend of hard-nosed play and soft skill is expected to translate seamlessly. While some public rankings place him higher, some scouts expect him to fall from typical top-10 lists, viewing him as a small winger without elite offense.
Prospects 11-20:
11. Carter Bear, F, Everett (WHL): Coveted for high-end instincts and playmaking. Was one of the CHL’s most dangerous offensive players and a reliable defensive forward before injury. Versatile (C/W), projects as a 65-75 point second-line player, likely winger. Quality playmaker, manipulates defenders, creates space, good hands in tight, excellent offensive facilitator. Strong two-way game, good stick positioning, tenacious forechecker, tracks well, finishes hits. Skating posture needs improvement for explosive stride. Good mix of soft/hard skill, projectable two-way traits, should thrive in matchup role while contributing offensively. Noted for a relentless motor.
12. Radim Mrtka, D, Seattle (WHL): A large (6-6), right-handed defenseman with decent mobility, scouts are very excited about his shutdown ability. Could be the second defenseman drafted. Very difficult to get around, routinely thwarting attackers, killing plays. Projects top-four, shutdown D due to stick work, mobility, transition defense. Uses mobility to escape pressure, activate, make quality passes. Should develop into strong transition D, reliable PK, efficient puck mover. Shoots hard but needs to pick spots. Concerns about lack of offense. Size/physicality tools for minute-munching shutdown D if mobility progresses. Late birthday provides development runway. While possessing limitless ceiling potential, some insiders find him “nothing special” beyond size/skate and question his physicality and passive tendencies.
13. Brady Martin, F, Sault Ste. Marie (OHL): A “Swiss Army knife” likely most effective on the wing due to strong wall play. Projects middle-six forward, routinely scoring 20 goals, with second-line upside. A wrecking ball, valuable in all three zones, on/off puck. Scouts rave after excellent U18 performance, some thinking he could go very early. Workhorse without off switch, blend of physicality/hard skill. Nightmare to contain, forces defenders into precarious positions, good speed, makes “winning” plays. Gets involved physically even without offensive game. Valuable third-line pest if scoring doesn’t translate. Impressed in combine interviews. Hard-nosed style + attractive personality = rare combination. Sam Bennett comp grabbed attention. While some call him the draft’s most feared body checker, others caution against U18 hype, seeing him potentially as a middle-six wing due to being “not a smart player.”
14. Justin Carbonneau, F, Blainville-Boisbriand (QMJHL): Possesses coveted offensive toolbox: powerful skating, eye-popping creativity. Projects second-line scoring forward with significant variance (likely middle-six vs secondary matchups). Drives offense (playmaking/shooting), well-rounded offense, plays through contact, puckhandling, above-average skating. High upside but inherent risk. Physically mature (6-1, 191), needs adjust to pro speed. Thrives with time/space, needs simplify/better decisions. Tools for effective power forward (25 goals) with cerebral component. Some insiders expect him to go higher than anticipated, calling him a “handful” with valuable playoff attributes (hits, skates well, legit offense).
15. Lynden Lakovic, F, Moose Jaw (WHL): Large (6-4) left winger with translatable scoring ability and excellent speed for his size. Room to fill out makes him attractive. Attacks linearly, uses frame to protect puck, makes plays with deception. Potential dual-threat winger if passing translates like shooting. Projects middle-six winger (fair confidence) due to scoring/speed/size, chance at second-line threat. Development needed on physical side – lean on defenders, force way to middle ice to leverage hands/shot. Becomes more dangerous if he does. Developable skill combined with instincts/skill could make him dual-threat 65-point winger. Insiders flag him for issues with compete, getting to the middle, physical engagement, and ordinary hockey sense.
16. Logan Hensler, D, Wisconsin (NCAA): Projects second-pair blueliner excelling in transition. One of the best neutral-zone defenders/puck movers, steadily improved as NCAA freshman. Puck retrievals, breakout passes, offensive-zone passes consistently put team in advantageous positions. RHD with excellent mobility, easily translatable game = attractive. Some scout concerns about NHL offense, but showed flashes (drawing D, slick plays) in back half. Unlikely 60-point D, projects 35-45 pts as steady transition/shutdown D. NHL-ready frame. Seen as a longer-term project, decision-making under pressure became an issue in college.
17. Braeden Cootes, F, Seattle (WHL): Likely first center taken in back half of 1st round. Target for teams seeking two-way, high-motor center. Lacks explosive offense, but potential 60-point two-way C with shot mechanic development. Scouts love consistent feet movement, drive to play through middle, ability to create advantages (skating/compete). Ability to create space for teammates, move puck to advantageous areas = highly translatable. Proactive with contact, reliable two-way, all areas. Strong skater/leader. Floor: third-line checking C. Potential: two-way second-line C (attractive bet on offense dev). Praised by one source for being constantly engaged, excellent off-puck, having speed, and a strong U18 showing. Size and skill sufficiency linger questions.
18. Cameron Reid, D, Kitchener (OHL): Lot to love, lots of varying opinions (top 15 to mid 20s), hinges on belief in his offense. Play driver from back end, excellent puck-moving/skating. Flashes high-end offense (setups, finding/creating passing lanes), needs shot threat. One of best in transition (both sides). Smooth retrievals, shoulder checks, escapes pressure with elite edgework, quick outlet. Consensus middle-pairing, transition D, potential bona fide No. 3 if offense/size (5-11) develop. Highly rated by some insiders as an elite skating defenseman with good skill/sense, expected to be successful despite not being a big points producer.
19. Kashawn Aitcheson, D, Barrie (OHL): Very real chance drafted near top 10 due to game type and team thirst for bite on back end. Projects No. 4/5 defender (below higher upside players). Plays with truculence/aggression, aura of confidence. Makings of complete menace playing tough minutes. Plays same rough style preseason/playoffs, unafraid to lower boom. Needs pick spots (penalties). Requires opponent awareness. Scouts see him hard-nosed, two-way D with significant bite, momentum-shifter. Needs development (skating/playmaking raw), but competitive attributes/dev curve promising. Offensive involvement developed. Likely 2-3 yrs away, but coaches/GMs want him. While one source calls him an “apex predator” with unique potential, others list him as potentially overrated due to major questions regarding his hockey sense and decisions.
20. Cole Reschny, F, Victoria (WHL): Two-way center, excellent mix of hockey sense, playmaking, creativity. Middle-six contributor, consistently 60 points. Lacks elite skating, but combine results (tied Frondell VO2 max) raised eyebrows (dedication). Smaller (5-10, 183), relies on cerebral approach/passing to create advantage. Processes game better, manages pressure, better puck protection. Defensively instinctive, positionally sound, above puck, disrupts, communicates. Potential great two-way complementary C, creates offense without speed. Reads mean PK role, relied on holding lead.
Prospects 21-30:
21. Benjamin Kindel, F, Calgary (WHL): Scoring machine. 60-point rookie year, vaulted to elite (7th in WHL), excellent even strength. Undersized (5-10, 176), blends pace, vision, instincts. Middle-six winger with two-way ability. Relentless motor makes up for lack of speed, weaves through traffic, give-and-go’s. Dual-threat (accurate shot/dangerous passing). Elite hockey sense, outsmarts opponents, sets teammates up creatively. Positionally sound off-puck. Defensively/forecheck leverages intelligence, anticipation, effort despite size. Needs refine skating posture, puck control, add speed gear. Potential top-six, more likely middle-six complementary. Possesses high-end tools but needs to put it together at pro level (shot, strength).
22. Cullen Potter, F, Arizona State (NCAA): Dynamic skater, fastest straight-line, explosive mobility among best. Uncommon jump (U17 to NCAA). Elite acceleration/agility, effortlessly shifting, cutting sharply. Initially relied on raw skill, avoided physical battles, forced “hope plays,” limited effectiveness early. Evolution second half elevated game dramatically – embraced D responsibilities, improved physical play (despite 5-10), won battles, filled lanes, improved positional/off-puck play. Added D dimension complements offense, elevates floor (bottom-six checker), high upside (top-six) due to steep development curve. Development in transition, using skating/shot with changing gears = more dangerous. Seen by some scouts as potentially overrated, a one-dimensional offensive player with elite skating but average compete and limited playmaking.
23. Malcolm Spence, F, Erie (OHL): Projects confidently high-energy, two-way winger for contender’s third line. Relentless motor, physical tenacity, professional D habits. Concerns about lacking true dynamic offense, but game translates easily, higher floor than others in range. Best: disruptive force, ferocious forecheck, relentless on wall, D reliable. Thrives alongside skilled teammates, creates space with effort, capitalizes on scoring chances. Scouts like game-changing impact (forechecking, battles, drawing penalties). Offensive growth plateaued, tempered expectations (projection 3rd line w/ bottom-six floor). If asserts physical dominance, consistent playmaking, uptick in scoring = secondary middle six contributor. Blend of competitiveness, pro details, D reliability = solid bet as key complementary piece.
24. Joshua Ravensbergen, G, Prince George (WHL): Clear-cut top goaltender prospect. Projects composed, confident demeanor, confident projection starting NHLer, handles workload. 6-5, leverages size, elite anticipation, crisp lateral agility, positions perfectly, denies shooters without flash. Tracks puck level above peers, confidently challenges, cuts angles. Vulnerable five-hole (typical large Gs), needs refine technique. Reliable backstop, .901 SV% stands out vs high danger. Rebound control well above average, above average glove. Blocker angled well. Projects platoon starter till mid-20s, then full-time (60-65 games). Consensus #1 goalie, potential late 1st/high 2nd. Some love size/athleticism/starter potential, others hesitant due to tough stretches/inconsistency. High-risk, high-reward.
25. Blake Fiddler, D, Edmonton (WHL): One of draft’s intriguing defenders: size (6-4), mobility, untapped upside. NHL family (Vernon Fiddler). Performed well int’l. D-zone dominance/transition skill eases NHL transition. D toolkit stands out: mobility, tight gap, balanced pivots, high-quality neutral zone D. Physically imposing, disrupts, maintains body positioning, eliminates threats, positionally sound. Defense clear calling card, flashes creativity (manipulates D, fakes, difficult breakouts). Needs refine reads/timing/decision-making (miscues). Needs patience. Continued development in gap/awareness/physical engagement, profiles confidently reliable second-pair shutdown D, drives play in transition. Seen by insiders as having a desirable identity – hard, skates well, enough skill – appreciated by coaches.
Prospects 26-35:
26. Jack Nesbitt, F, Windsor (OHL): Intelligent, two-way center. Game rooted in competitiveness, D reliability, off-puck IQ. Excels defensively (6-4 frame, break up plays, physical, stick positioning). Hockey sense places him well, creates turnovers, quick passes off turnovers. Offensive upside hinges on skating (concern: stiff stride, lacks flexibility). Struggles maneuvering past defenders, inconsistent puck handling disrupts playmaking. Showed improvement (leveraging size offensively, initiating contact). If cont. improves + skating improves, projects confidently dependable middle-six C, anchors defensive line, supports skilled players. Despite poor U18s, insiders expect him late first round, valued as big, heavy center with skill.
27. Sascha Boumedienne, D, Boston University (NCAA): One of most discussed/debated defenders. Projects second-pair, two-way D. Brilliant breakout passer, heavy shot, strong stick play. D game evolved at BU. Steadily improved skating (agility/edge), looked like modern shutdown D (transition). Greater stability, more effective gap/pivots. Proactive reads, strong positioning, physicality, disrupts passing. Offensive game primarily rush-based. Willingness to experiment (fakes/deception) improved transition impact. Volatility high, but substantial in-season growth, D reliability, refined skating = realistic upside effective second-pair, two-way D with secondary offense.
28. Ryker Lee, F, Madison (USHL): One of most skilled/creative forwards. Some scouts rank late teens (belief in upside). Dynamic offensive player, cuts through coverage (elite puckhandling, deceptive passes). One-timer among best. Full high-end tools, rare ability to create in tight space, stood out in USHL. Manipulates D, delivers elite passes under pressure. Makes translatable plays (one-touch breakouts, fake receptions, quick releases). Willingness to forecheck, battle, apply D pressure increased. Glaring question: skating (stiff stride, lacks explosiveness). Needs major strides in mobility. If adds step or two, skill could make him creative middle-six playmaker w/ top-six upside. Flagged by insiders for poor compete and habits, not great skater for size – potentially falls out of top two rounds.
29. Jack Murtagh, F, USNTDP (USHL): Versatile, energetic winger. NTDP’s most compelling prospect in down year. Relentless style, explosive stride, thrives in battles, leverages speed/physicality. Strong shot package (explosive one-timer), dangerous off rush. Playmaking developed (above-average awareness, impressive passing). Ability to complement scoring w/ distribution should develop at BC. Needs diversify transition, use teammates more, rely less on speed/power (unlock middle-six ceiling). Tenacious style, goal-scoring instincts, improved playmaking project safely to third-line power forward role.
30. Bill Zonnon, F, Rouyn-Noranda (QMJHL): Relentless, detail-oriented two-way forward. Reputation one of CHL’s hardest-working. 83-point breakout first full C season. High-end motor, raw but effective playmaking, relentless puck pursuit = play driver all zones. Excels forecheck (pressuring D), winning battles, moving pucks to teammates. Offensively makes good reads under pressure, threads pucks, puts team in advantageous spots. Supports defensively, facilitates transitions, physically imposes = playoff forward. Skating limiting factor, needs improve agility/posture. If refines stride, cont. develop playmaking, projects middle-six driver blending tenacity, valuable third-liner playoff teams covet.
31. Shane Vansaghi, F, Michigan State (NCAA): Steady riser. Tenacious power winger, physical dominance/competitive fire = NHL-ready player. Many nights “man among boys” – excellent forecheck, punishing checks, bulldozes through contact, establishes inside position. Offensively showed flashes: good puckhandling, heavy release, beats defenders 1v1. Net-front play/winning body position = potential effective net-front player (deflect, rebounds). Skating lacks explosiveness/agility, needs significant revamp (tough given maturity). If improves first few steps, could evolve middle-six force complementing skill with relentless physical play. Physically imposing, seen by some insiders as potentially high-risk, high-reward.
32. William Moore, F, USNTDP (USHL): Intriguing upside bet despite plateau over two NTDP seasons. Feeling among scouts: plateau related to NTDP structure stifling creativity. Skilled forward, strong skating, good puck skill, offensive instincts. Moments of brilliance (manipulating D, threading look-off passes, high-end puck protection). Best: combines finesse/power, winning wall battles, screens, body position = offense. Quality blend hard/soft skill. Excels possession, commands shifts (deception, slick hands). Lack of consistency questions what player he can be. Lack of physical strength/assertiveness off-puck lessens impact, leads to quiet nights/ “invisibility.” If raises engagement/strength, real second-line potential. Otherwise, versatile third-line F, complementary offense/second PP.
33. Nathan Behm, F, Kamloops (WHL): Dynamic winger with skill to develop into middle-six NHL scorer, outside shot at second-line. Combines creative playmaking, deceptive shooting, above-average puck handling. Beats D by manipulating, using reach, pulling pucks. Soft hands, catches pucks effortlessly, quick slot passes/shots. NHL-ready build, needs improve pace/engage physically. If develops, projects dual-threat offensive F in scoring role. Without, settles into bottom-six. Late first/second round value swing on upside.
34. Cameron Schmidt, F, Vancouver (WHL): Goal scorer. Likely goes lower than some lists, but scoring ability among best. Elite finishing, high-end speed, above-average puck handling. Scores in variety of ways. Difficult to read (deceptive movements). Despite 5-7 frame, rare physical edge, flashes playmaking. Scouts question effectiveness (needs grow to 5-9?). Boom-or-bust pick. If rounds out playmaking, uses toolkit consistently, could be dynamic second-line scorer, draft steal. Widely considered potentially overrated by insiders (third-round talent to some), citing general issues, second-half slowdown, questionable hockey sense, not special enough scorer.
35. Henry Brzustewicz, D, London (OHL): Next prospect from London Knights factory. Blueliner projects steady, mobile transition D, potential No. 4/5 NHL blueliner. RHD, strong D foundation, maintains good gap, moves puck well, supports plays, positionally sound. In elevated role, offensive creativity developed dramatically. Jumped into rush, evaded forecheckers, created chances (quality passes). If develops confidence/play-driving, could evolve reliable second-pairing D. Without growth, still value as depth puck mover with good D foundation.
Prospects 36-45:
36. Cole McKinney, F, USNTDP (USHL): Likely had offense stifled by program, signs he has more. Projects competitive third-line C, above-average two-way. NTDP leading scorer, efficient USHL producer. Standout attributes: relentless puck pursuit, smart positioning, strong PK instincts. Offensively thrives off cycle, supports play, quick decisions, above-average net-front. Puck handling/shooting limit top-six upside, but some scouts see middle-six potential. Minimum: motor, D value, play-driving habits = clear path bottom-six role. Noted by insiders for a strong finish to the season – seen as underrated.
37. Milton Gästrin, F, MoDo (J20 Nationell): One of most well-rounded, translatable two-way centers. Projects reliable third-line NHLer. Combines high-end D instincts, strong off-puck support, relentless motor. Many scouts believe reliable checking C. Playmaking developing (might provide more offense, top out 30-40 pts). Reliable play driver, coaches comfortable playing him all zones. Lacks dynamic offense, but intelligence, versatility, steady skating dev = low-risk bet effective bottom-six C.
38. Václav Nestrašil, F, Muskegon (USHL): High-upside power forward, projects top-six NHL winger if development continues. Unique blend: above average puck skill/playmaking with size, motor, punishing physical play. Excels give-and-go’s, attacking off wall, creating space. Moves puck (carries/passes) to middle. Raw/erratic reads/timing, but cont. improvement/physical toolkit = legitimate upside. More consistent = second-line force. If not, D value/intensity still project role physical bottom-six winger. Flagged by insiders for poor compete/habits, not great skater for size.
39. Carter Amico, D, USNTDP (USHL): 6-5 RHD with mobility, physicality, D instincts = grows into No. 4/5 NHL blueliner. Injuries a concern, but when healthy: kills rushes (aggressive gap), clears crease with authority (NHL scouts love), starts breakouts (good first pass). Offensively shows flashes, limited reps/inconsistencies (injury) leave questions. If healthy, cont. develop transition at BC, tools become physical, play-driving D with No. 4 upside.
40. Jacob Ihs-Wozniak, F, Lulua (J20 Nationell): Goal-scoring machine, best finishing touch in class. Arsenal NHL-caliber shots, great off-puck instincts, developing playmaking. Middle-six scoring upside. Times movements well (rebounds, slot chances), difficult to tie up. Not play driver, but frame, scoring touch, offense instincts = good bet complementary player. Needs improve speed (improves transition/wall play). Potential PP threat/goal scorer boosts NHL floor to third-line.
41. Eric Nilson, F, Djurgardens IF (J20 Nationell): Projects defensively reliable, bottom-six checking center with PK value. Fluid skater, high motor, strong two-way instincts. Consistently supports all zones, eliminates space backcheck, top defensive F at J20 level. Offensively drives transition, flashes playmaking/shot. Scouts question willingness to drive middle (needed for two-way NHL). Needs develop playmaking, fill out physically. If develops traits + sound D, carves out bottom-six role.
42. Benjamin Kevan, F, Des Moines (USHL): Skilled, speedy winger. Potential middle-six scoring threat if rounds out game. Dynamic skater, elite transition, flashy puck skill. Creates off rush (give-and-go’s, creative passes). Uses speed defensively (pressure puck carriers). Needs develop offensive-zone play. If adds strength/physicality, could evolve two-way, play-driving winger. Upside bet, likely AHL scorer without polishing O-zone.
43. Alexander Zharovsky, F, Tolpar Ufa (MHL): Some of best hands in draft. Elite puck handler, high-end creativity/offensive instincts. Most skilled European F? Slow start then exploded (46 pts in 29 MHL), held own KHL playoffs. Manipulates D to create (self/teammates), dual-threat (scorer/playmaker). Skating/D need develop, but raw skill ceiling undeniable. Boom-or-bust winger, KHL performance indicator success likely. Proper development: middle-six scorer/PP threat.
44. Max Pšenička, D, Portland (WHL): Big riser second half. Projects two-way, shutdown D, tools become reliable No. 4/5. Good speed, physicality, smart D reads, forces dump-ins, battles. Offensively flashes creativity breakouts/rush activation. Needs puck control/passing precision boosts offense. Aggressive play/competitiveness = playoff D. 6-4, 176 lbs, room to fill out = strong net-front. If cont. develop offense/adds strength, upside become reliable second-pair D with grit.
45. Kurban Limatov, D, MHK Dynamo Moskva (MHL): High-upside, boom-or-bust D, second-pair potential. Elite mobility/physical tools, 6-3, explosive skating evades forecheckers, drives transition. D reads improved, allowed more physicality/aggressiveness. Offensively raw/chaotic, but signs creativity. If cont. improve decision-making, dynamic two-way D. If not, high-minute KHLer. NHL upside intriguing second rounder. Flagged by insiders as potentially high-risk, high-reward, and raw.
Prospects 46-55:
46. William Horcoff, F, University of Michigan (NCAA): Son of Shawn Horcoff. Projects defensively reliable third-line center. Size, strength, strong off-puck instincts. Nearly 6-5, disruptive D zone, uses range/physicality. Offensively facilitates (smart passes), uses size (contact, puck protection). Needs develop skating (speed/mobility) for offense. If adds step/explosiveness/fills out, physically imposing two-way pivot bottom-six role vs secondary matchups.
47. Daniil Prokhorov, F, MHK Dynamo St. Petersburg (MHL): 6-5, “freight train on skates.” Physically dominant winger, middle-six power forward upside. Most physically imposing player. Punishing hits, protects puck, drives net with force. Heavy shot, straight-line speed (20-goal MHL season), flashes skill. Needs develop hockey sense (“tunnel vision” limits playmaking/decisions). If improves reads/off-puck awareness, rare punishing middle-six winger. Without growth, direct path depth NHL role (physicality/size).
48. Jack Ivankovic, G, Brampton (OHL): Projects poised, technically sound platoon starter w/ upside No. 1. Under 6 feet, elite skating, excellent positioning, controlled patient movements. Tracks/handles chaos. Standout for Hockey Canada (U18 gold), plays bigger than size, reads screens, composed. Height concern (dad 6-5, hope grows). If grows, mental makeup/technical foundation = good bet one of best goalies.
49. Luca Romano, F, Kitchener (OHL): High-speed C, great motor. Projects middle-six, two-way forward. Play-driving value transition. Thrives off rush, uses speed/edge work to carry pucks, creates chances, keeps feet moving. Defensively relentless backchecker, good position, strong stickwork. Lacks dynamic offensive creativity, but flashes playmaking/shooting in stride (more to give). If develops creativity, uses space from speed, could evolve reliable middle-six C with speed/two-way.
50. Mason West, F, Edina High (USHS-MN): Best overall athlete. HS QB (college football potential) + hockey player (top 50 NHL pick) = rare. 6-6 F, rare mobility/physical tools/intriguing upside. Natural shooter, smooth skater. Impressive HS production. USHL dev accelerated (“warp speed”). Very raw. Flashes skill, immovable net-front, growing physical engagement. Needs develop puck control/positioning/decision-making. QB scanning helps hockey decisions. Real chance middle-six NHL power forward. Pure raw ability excites executives/scouts. Seen as fascinating prospect with significant risk due to multi-sport commitment.
51. Jacob Rombach, D, Lincoln (USHL): Tall (6-6½), mobile D. Scouts believe shutdown ability. Projects second-pair shutdown D, elite D instincts, good puck retrievals. Handles pressure well. Shoulder checks, scans, absorbs contact, escapes w/ smart passes. Won’t be offensive contributor, could develop plus transition offensively. Needs improve skating posture for physicality. Continued dev at Minn = quality shutdown D top-four NHL role.
52. Eddie Genborg, F, Linkoping HC (J20 Nationell): Projects bottom-six checking winger, strong chance play NHL. Size, physicality, pro details. 6-2, relentless forechecker, great motor, strong cycle, excellent defensively. Impressed earning 20+ SHL games, led J20 goal pace (buoys projection confidence). Scoring should translate (net-front, good catch-and-release). Offensive ceiling limited (instincts, average playmaking). Blend strength, effort, two-way value = clear NHL path physical depth forward.
53. Semyon Frolov, G, MHK Spartak Moskva (MHL): Steady riser. Projects 1B platoon G, potential push larger role. 6-3, blends strong puck tracking/athleticism w/ smart positioning. Calm under pressure, sharp save selection, excels vs high danger. Aggressive style adds value. Splitting time (3 MHL teams) showed adaptability/consistency. Little issue adjusting to KHL. Some believe goes early second (size, athleticism, demeanor attractive). Seen as a top goalie contender by some insiders, though Russian factor noted.
54. Matthew Gard, F, Red Deer (WHL): Projects reliable bottom-six checking center. Motor, size, D IQ to earn NHL role. Excels pushing attackers perimeter, disrupting, forechecking. Nonstop energy, strength/body positioning win battles, create space. Primarily D player, signs playmaking/speed dev could increase offense. If offense plateaus, high motor, detail-oriented game = strong bet anchoring NHL fourth line (“safe bet” coach trusts D zone/PK).
55. Ivan Ryabkin, F, Muskegon (USHL): Polarizing player. Boom-or-bust power forward, middle-six upside. Blends quick release, creativity, punishing physicality (inconsistently). Slow start Russia, USHL move reignited (top goal scorer second half). Threat off rush (one-timers, in-tight), flashes playmaking. Inconsistent pace, poor decision-making, undisciplined physicality limit reliability/NHL potential. Dials in effort/details, skill/grit could make dangerous scorer. Otherwise, unlikely NHLer. Candidate to fall out top two rounds. Flagged by insiders for poor compete/habits, not great skater for size.
Prospects 56-64 & Honorable Mentions:
56. Ethan Czata, F, Niagara (OHL): Projects bottom-six checking center. Strong D instincts, PK value, underrated playmaking. Drop in production, but D play impressive (positioning, physicality, disrupts). Offensively flashes quality passing, spatial awareness (off-puck). Responsible two-way, hard skill = strong candidate NHL depth. Needs add speed/develop O-playmaking (more than fourth-line C).
57. Charlie Trethewey, D, USNTDP (USHL): Projects No. 4/5 two-way D. Blend powerful skating, physicality, heavy shot. Improved scanning, stickwork, breakouts = steady shutdown presence. Takes away time/space, punishing hits, activates. Next step: improve decision-making/passing when activates. D details/play under pressure dev cont., physical toolkit = legitimate NHL potential hard-nosed second-pair D.
58. Theo Stockselius, F, Djurgardens (J20 Nationell): Projects third-line, two-way forward. Strong playmaking instincts, hard skill, projectable physical tools. Quality passer, high-end hockey sense, consistently creates O (intelligent playmaking/passing). Led Djurgardens playoff scoring, key U18 contributor. Started physically engaging/using body more. Below-average skater (speed/mechanics), needs improve. If does, middle-six contributor. If not, compensates with smart position/physical play = bottom-six.
59. Haoxi (Simon) Wang, D, Oshawa (OHL): True project, second-pair NHL upside. Rare blend size (6-6)/elite mobility. Late arrival competitive hockey, still learning. Potential two-way D (eliminating space, escaping pressure, skating pucks). OHL exposed rawness (inconsistent reads, turnovers), but consistently improved retrievals, breakouts, D play. Significant dev: rangy, shutdown D w/ decent puck-moving. High-risk, high-reward swing, tests team dev staff.
60. L.J. Mooney, F, USNTDP (USHL): “One of my favorites.” High-energy winger, explosive speed, quick hands, nonstop motor. Dynamic off rush, beats defenders (speed/handling). Concerns about 5-7 frame/questionable decision-making, but more separating skills than many. Thrives in chaos (hockey sense/decision-making should improve). Many smaller players don’t play D, but he’s consistently above puck, good position, far more physically engaged. If develops playmaking, middle-six spark plug, two-way impact, complementary scoring.
61. Hayden Paupanekis, F, Kelowna (WHL): Versatile “Swiss Army knife.” Showed two sides: shutdown specialist, play driver. Competitive, physical C, NHL-ready D detail, consistently shut down top lines. Not special at anything, does everything average/better, professional style. Stays above puck, supports, wins battles (6-4 helps). Skating/hands manage pressure/make plays at speed (more O upside). Scoring instincts work in progress. Speed, strength, PK potential = clear bottom-six NHL projection, room to grow.
62. Tyler Hopkins, F, Kingston (OHL): Projects bottom-six forward. Projectable D game, motor reliability checking role. Defends pro details (patient, physical, disrupts). Good puck protection, wins battles. Offensively efficient passes, skating beats players to pucks. Offensive upside limited, playmaking has developable traits. High floor (PK, reliable two-way) = “safe bet” reach NHL (fourth-line).
63. Peyton Kettles, D, Swift Current (WHL): 6-5, good blend size, physicality, strong D instincts. Trusted key D situations. Long reach, good position, close gaps, force attackers perimeter, win boards. Puck moving limited (risk-averse style), showed flashes plays under pressure. Skating/mobility needs develop for play under pressure. Youngest players, longer dev path. Tools become dependable, hard-to-play-against blueliner (No. 4/5 shutdown role).
64. Kristian Epperson, F, Saginaw (OHL): Made most of second eligible season. Earned top line next to Misa, proved could drive own. Relentless forechecker, reads play, times routes, stifles breakout. Good blend above-average playmaking, hockey sense, nonstop motor. Creates space, plays connected, supports all zones. Needs add step or two for NHL effectiveness. Remains project, but two-way play, puck-moving skill, hockey sense = shot carving out third-line NHL role.
Honorable Mentions:
Adam Benak (F), Aleksei Medvedev (G), Conrad Fondrk (F), Malte Vass (D). These players represent additional depth and intriguing options for teams in the later rounds of the draft.
As the draft approaches, teams will finalize their boards based on their specific philosophies and needs. The journey for these prospects is just beginning, and their ultimate impact will be determined not just by where they are selected, but by the development and dedication they show in the years to come. Like the 2014 draft class stars now competing for the Stanley Cup, being ready for the opportunity when it arises is key.
