Understanding the Physicality Directed at Caitlin Clark in the WNBA
Since joining the WNBA, Indiana Fever star Caitlin Clark has been the subject of significant attention, both for her undeniable talent and for the seemingly excessive physical contact she faces on the court. Discussions about whether Clark is being “targeted” or simply experiencing the typical physicality of the professional game have been ongoing.
Adding a notable voice to this conversation is award-winning coach Lisa Bluder. Having coached Clark at the University of Iowa, leading the team to two Final Four appearances, Bluder offers a unique perspective on the situation.
Coach Bluder’s Take on the WNBA’s Physicality
According to Bluder, while opponents might not necessarily be trying to injure Clark intentionally, they are undoubtedly playing with an intense level of physicality against her every night. She suggests this could be part of a strategic approach outlined in scouting reports – essentially giving her their “best shot.”
Bluder believes the root of the issue lies not just in player intent, but fundamentally in how the game is currently being officiated.
The Proposed Solution: Enforce “Freedom of Movement”
Coach Bluder’s solution, which she acknowledges “people won’t like” initially, is straightforward: the league needs to change its officiating standards. She proposes calling more fouls to enforce greater “freedom of movement” on the court.
This approach would lead to a significant increase in foul calls, a prospect that might be unpopular at first glance. However, Bluder argues that players would quickly adapt their style of play. The motivation is simple: players want to remain on the court and avoid fouling out, forcing them to reduce excessive contact.
Holding Players Accountable
A recent incident involving Connecticut Sun guards Marina Mabrey and Jacy Sheldon highlighted the concerns. After Sheldon poked Clark in the eye and Clark bumped her, Mabrey pushed Clark to the floor from behind. Crucially, the on-court officials did not immediately call a flagrant foul or eject Mabrey.
From Bluder’s perspective, and that of many observers, this incident and the initial lack of a severe on-court penalty illustrate the problem of players not facing sufficient immediate accountability for overly aggressive actions. While the league later upgraded Mabrey’s foul to a flagrant 2 and issued a fine, critics felt this delayed action and penalty felt insufficient – a “slap on the wrist” – given the circumstances.
Bluder’s proposed solution directly addresses this perceived lack of accountability. By consistently and strictly calling more fouls, especially those impacting a player’s freedom of movement, the league could compel a shift in defensive strategies and player behavior, potentially reducing the excessive physicality directed at star players like Caitlin Clark.
