US Strikes in Nigeria: ISIS, Politics, & Complex Conflict ## Unpacking the US Airstrikes in Nigeria: Beyond Simple Narratives On December 25, 2025, the United States conducted military airstrikes in northwest Nigeria, targeting elements of the Islamic State (ISIS). These **US strikes in Nigeria** ignited a complex discussion, revealing conflicting narratives from various stakeholders, from President Trump’s administration to the Nigerian government and regional experts. While President Trump framed the strikes as a direct response to the alleged persecution of Christians, a deeper look uncovers a multifaceted conflict driven by religious extremism, banditry, and severe governance challenges in West Africa. This article delves into the specifics of these significant **US strikes in Nigeria**, exploring the diverse motivations, the nature of the targeted groups, and the intricate socio-political landscape of Nigeria. We will dissect the differing perspectives, examine the broader implications for regional security, and provide expert analysis on the enduring challenges facing Nigeria. Understanding this intervention requires moving beyond simplified explanations to grasp the true complexities at play. ## Christmas Day Operations: What Happened in Sokoto? The U.S. military operation involved Tomahawk missiles, reportedly fired from a ship off Nigeria’s coast. A U.S. official confirmed more than a dozen missiles hit two ISIS training camps. Local security analysts identified at least four impact sites within **Nigeria’s northwest Sokoto state**, an area near the border with Niger. Residents in the remote rural zones reported no loss of life or property, only scorched earth and debris. President Trump announced he had delayed these “powerful and deadly” strikes until Christmas Day. He aimed to send a clear message to what he called “ISIS terrorist scum” who were “viciously killing, primarily, innocent Christians.” He threatened further action if such violence persisted. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth echoed this, thanking the Nigerian government for its support and signaling more action. This marked a notable shift from Trump’s prior criticisms of Abuja. However, the Nigerian government presented a different perspective. Foreign Minister Yusuf Tuggar described the operation as a “joint effort.” He stressed that Nigeria provided crucial intelligence, emphasizing it was “not targeting any particular religion.” Instead, it was a coordinated counter-terrorism measure against extremist groups. ## The Targeted Group: Unpacking Lakurawa and ISIS Sahel The primary target of the **US strikes in Nigeria** was identified as Lakurawa. This group claims affiliation with ISIS Sahel. It operates in Nigeria’s northwest, exploiting regions where effective governance is lacking. Security experts like former U.S. special envoy J. Peter Pham highlighted the complex origin of Lakurawa. They initially formed as local self-defense units in areas unprotected by the Nigerian state. Over time, however, these groups, particularly Lakurawa, transformed. Their ambitions expanded, and they established control over ungoverned territories. They began imposing a harsh interpretation of Islam. They also resorted to kidnapping young people to bolster their ranks. In essence, they evolved into the very “disease they were there to fight,” according to Pham. Their activities are often intertwined with local banditry and criminal enterprises. While they intimidate local residents, many of whom are Muslim, their motivations are not solely religious. They thrive on poor local governance and connections to larger terrorist networks in Niger and Mali. ## Conflicting Interpretations of Nigerian Violence The **US strikes in Nigeria** brought to the forefront starkly different interpretations of Nigeria’s security crisis. President Trump’s focus was clear: protecting Christians. Nina Shea, director of the Hudson Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom, supported this view. She cited a letter from Christian advocates to Trump. This letter accused the Nigerian government of tolerating “relentless aggression” against Christian farming families. Shea noted that local Christian leaders believe there is an effort to “cleanse the land of Christians” and establish Islamic rule. However, experts and Nigerian officials caution against oversimplifying the violence. They emphasize its multifaceted nature. Nigeria’s security challenges extend far beyond religious targeting. ### Beyond Religious Persecution: A Multifaceted Conflict * **Boko Haram in the Northeast:** In Nigeria’s northeast, groups like Boko Haram have a long history of violence. They have targeted both Muslims and Christians. They violently oppose female education and have bombed mosques. While they have indeed attacked Christian communities, their broader agenda is anti-state and extremist. * **Farmer-Herder Clashes in Central Nigeria:** In the country’s central regions, long-standing conflicts rage between nomadic Muslim herders and Christian farmers. These clashes are primarily over land, water, and scarce resources. Independent conflict monitor ACLED reported a rise in Christian fatalities in Central Nigeria, yet largely attributed them to these resource disputes, not religious targeting. * **Banditry and Kidnappings:** Particularly in the northwest, armed gangs engage in widespread kidnappings for ransom. They target clergy, travelers, and villagers indiscriminately. These acts are often criminal opportunism, further destabilizing communities. Nigerian Foreign Minister Tuggar explicitly stated that reducing the conflict to “Muslims killing Christians” is an oversimplification. He highlighted that violence affects members of all faiths, with Muslims often comprising the majority of victims. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has also committed to protecting all Nigerians, affirming that the country is not “religiously intolerant.” ## Expert Analysis: Impact and Governance Failures Ambassador J. Peter Pham, a former special envoy for the Sahel, expressed skepticism regarding the impact of the **US strikes in Nigeria**. He found the targeting location in Sokoto a “mystery.” He suggested other areas might have been more effective in addressing anti-Christian violence. Pham predicted a “very limited impact” from this specific strike on the core issue of religious persecution, though it does signal US willingness to act. Pham also raised concerns about coordination with the Nigerian government. He suggested “certain parts of the Nigerian government are suspect” due to potential internal agendas. He pointed to deep-seated issues like the Nigerian government’s lack of capacity and political will to effectively govern certain areas. This governance vacuum allows extremist groups to flourish. He even suggested some Nigerian politicians might have “political alliances with extremists.” The US has previously employed punitive measures against Nigeria, including adding it to a list of countries violating religious freedom and implementing travel restrictions. Yet, simultaneous security cooperation underscores the complex diplomatic efforts to address terrorism and insecurity in the region. While calling attention to the plight of all Nigerians suffering from violence is crucial, experts emphasize the need for caution in operational security and intelligence sharing. The differing narratives from the US and Nigerian governments often stem from differing “perspectives,” underscoring the necessity of a nuanced understanding of the crisis. ## The Broader Context and Future Implications The **US strikes in Nigeria** are part of a broader US anti-ISIS strategy, occurring shortly after similar retaliatory strikes in Syria. This intervention highlights the persistent threat of extremist groups across Africa and the challenges of international counter-terrorism efforts. The incident also shines a spotlight on the fragility of governance in vast swathes of the Sahel region. For Nigeria, the strikes underscore the urgent need for comprehensive internal reforms. This includes strengthening governance, improving security force capabilities, and fostering inter-communal harmony. President Tinubu’s commitment to protecting all citizens, irrespective of faith, remains a critical aspect of his administration’s agenda. The international community, led by partners like the United States, faces the ongoing task of supporting these efforts while navigating the complex realities of local politics and conflict dynamics. ## Frequently Asked Questions ### What was the primary motivation stated by President Trump for the US strikes in Nigeria? President Trump explicitly stated that the US strikes in Nigeria were ordered to protect Christians. He described the targets as “ISIS terrorist scum” who were “viciously killing, primarily, innocent Christians” at unprecedented levels. Trump reportedly delayed the strikes until Christmas Day to deliver a strong message to these groups. ### How do experts describe the actual complexities of violence in Nigeria beyond religious targeting? Experts, including former U.S. special envoy J. Peter Pham and Nigerian officials, emphasize that violence in Nigeria is multifaceted. Beyond religious extremism, conflicts stem from banditry, farmer-herder clashes over land and resources (often between Muslim herders and Christian farmers), and a pervasive lack of effective government governance. While some groups target Christians, violence affects members of all faiths, with Muslims often suffering significantly. ### What are the key challenges the Nigerian government faces in addressing internal security, as highlighted by experts? Experts point to a critical lack of government capacity and political will as central challenges. The Nigerian government struggles to provide protection and governance in many remote areas, allowing extremist and criminal groups to thrive. Additionally, there are concerns about internal political agendas and potential alliances between some Nigerian politicians and extremist elements, further complicating genuine efforts to secure the nation. ## Conclusion The **US strikes in Nigeria** on Christmas Day 2025 represent a significant moment in the global fight against terrorism, yet they simultaneously illuminate the profound complexities of conflict in West Africa. While presented by the Trump administration as a targeted response to Christian persecution, the reality on the ground, as dissected by experts and Nigerian officials, reveals a far more intricate tapestry of religious extremism, economic grievances, and governance deficits. The targeted Lakurawa group, while affiliated with ISIS, exemplifies how local self-defense initiatives can morph into predatory forces amidst state weakness. Moving forward, effective strategies for peace and security in Nigeria and the broader Sahel region must acknowledge these nuanced realities. Any external intervention must be carefully coordinated, prioritizing local context and addressing the root causes of instability, rather than relying on oversimplified narratives. The enduring challenge for Nigeria and its international partners remains fostering genuine governance, rebuilding trust, and protecting all citizens from violence, regardless of their faith or background. **Word Count Check:** 1180

us-strikes-in-nigeria-isis-politics-complex-c-694f98961eb3c

By —

Nick Schifrin

Leave your feedback

Share

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Transcript

Audio

President Trump said that he delayed U.S. military strikes in Nigeria until Christmas Day to deliver a message to groups he alleges are targeting Christians. The Nigerian government praised the attacks and said it provided the U.S. with the necessary intelligence. Nick Schifrin discussed more with former Amb. J. Peter Pham, the special envoy for the Sahel Region during Trump’s first term.

Read the Full Transcript

Notice: Transcripts are machine and human generated and lightly edited for accuracy. They may contain errors.

William Brangham:

Welcome to the “News Hour.”

President Trump said today that he delayed American military strikes in northwest Nigeria until Christmas Day to deliver a message to groups he alleges are targeting Christians in that country. Meanwhile, the Nigerian government praised the attacks and said it provided the U.S. with the necessary intelligence.

Nick Schifrin is here with the details — Nick.

Nick Schifrin:

William, the area that the U.S. bombed in Nigeria is near the border of neighboring Niger and a part of Western Africa that suffered from cross-border terrorism. Northern Nigeria has suffered from violence for years.

And while the president describes this as focus on protecting Christians, the violence in Nigeria and the groups committing it are far more complex.

In the Gulf of Guinea, a Tomahawk missile flies to an area never before struck by the U.S. military, Northwest Nigeria, where locals picked up debris as nearby flames kept burning.

By day, the grass was scorched and police cordoned off an impact site. This missile, at least in this remote rural area, apparently killed no one.

Nuhu Umar Jago, Nigerian Resident:

There was no loss of life and no loss of property.

Nick Schifrin:

A U.S. military official tells “PBS News Hour” a ship off Nigeria’s coast fired more than a dozen Tomahawks at two ISIS training camps. Local security analysts say the missiles hit in at least four locations, all in Nigeria’s northwest Sokoto state.

The area has been plagued by a group known as Lakurawa that claims affiliation with ISIS Sahel and exploits poor local governance and access to terrorist groups that operate in Niger and Mali. Nigeria declared them a terrorist organization, but locals say they’re connected to bandits and criminals, who’ve intimidated local residents, most of whom are Muslim, preaching radicalization, kidnapping hundreds of girls and young boys in an attempt to control and exploit the population.

Yusuf Tuggar, Nigerian Foreign Minister:

This is what we have always been hoping for, to work with the Americans.

Nick Schifrin:

Today, Nigerian Foreign Minister Yusuf Tuggar told Channel TV that Nigeria provided the U.S. intelligence.

Yusuf Tuggar:

It is a joint operation and it is not targeting any religion.

Nick Schifrin:

But, last night, President Trump wrote that the targets were — quote — “ISIS terrorist scum in Northwest Nigeria who have been targeting and viciously killing primarily innocent Christians at levels not seen for many years and even centuries.”

And today, he told Politico the strike was supposed to take place on Christmas Eve, but he said: “Nope, let’s give a Christmas present.”

Nina Shea, Center for Religious Freedom Director, Hudson Institute: The government doesn’t help the Christians. They’re not protecting them. They’re not protecting their villages.

Nick Schifrin:

Nina Shea directs the Hudson Institute’s Center of Religious Freedom. She and 30 other advocates, Christian organizations and think tanks wrote a letter in October to President Trump saying the Nigerian government “demonstrably tolerates relentless aggression uniquely against Christian farming families.”

Nina Shea:

Local Christian leaders are telling us that they are trying to cleanse the land of Christians, that they are establishing the land for Islamic rule.

Nick Schifrin:

In reality, Nigerian violence is more complex. For years, Islamist terrorists have plagued Northern and Northeast Nigeria. The best known is Boko Haram. They have targeted the Nigerian military and violently opposed female education. It’s bombed mosques. Boko Haram also targeted Christians, as I saw in 2015 in the eastern city of Mubi.

Outside the nearby Church of the Brethren, the damage is everywhere. Inside, high above the podium, the fire set by Boko Haram almost erased the cross from the wall.

Elia Usman, Church of the Brethren: When these people landed in Mubi, they will ask you, are you a Christian or a Muslim? When you say you’re a Christian, they will shoot you.

Nick Schifrin:

But that’s the northeast, far from today’s target. And then there’s the map. Most Nigerian Muslims live in the north. Most Christians live in the south, and in the middle, the two groups overlap, as do tribes, farmers and herders, who can clash violently.

For decades, nomadic herders, almost all of whom are Muslim, have fought farmers, most of whom are Christian, over land disputes and scarce resources. The independent conflict monitor ACLED tells “PBS News Hour” last year’s data show a rise in Christian fatalities, mostly in Central Nigeria, but the vast majority of the incidents were over land disputes, not targeting because of religion.

Yusuf Tuggar:

You can see how all these things are interconnected. So when you try to reduce it, you just say, oh, no, it’s Muslims killing Christians in Nigeria, you see how you can get it completely wrong.

Nick Schifrin:

And for more perspective on the U.S. strike against targets in Nigeria, we turn to former Ambassador Peter Pham. He was U.S. special envoy for the Sahel region during the first Trump administration. He’s now a distinguished fellow at the Atlantic Council and sits on the boards of a number of companies doing business in Africa.

Ambassador, thanks very much. Welcome back to the “News Hour.”

J. Peter Pham, Atlantic Council:

Good to be with you, Nick.

Nick Schifrin:

Explain who is being targeted here in the northwest. This is a group called Lakurawa connected to terrorists in the Sahel in Western Africa, but also criminals known as bandits in Nigeria.

J. Peter Pham:

Well, the group that was referred to in the piece, Nick, Lakurawa, is a good example, almost a classic one of the cure being worse than the disease.

They originally originated as self-defense groups in an area where the Nigerian government and some of the neighboring countries were unable to provide protection for local communities. So they set up their own self-defense groups.

Unfortunately, over the years, these groups, their ambitions grew. And in the case of Lakurawa, in Sokoto state and some of the neighboring states, as well as in Mali and Niger, they have grown to establish dominion over areas of territory where the government is — quite frankly, it doesn’t run and is excluded.

And they have been increasingly imposing upon the people they were — started to protect a harsh vision of Islam and a hard-line vision, and increasingly kidnapping young people to fill up their ranks. So they have become, in effect, the disease they were there to fight.

Nick Schifrin:

And I don’t want to conflate these groups. The analysts I speak to says it’s not Lakurawa, it’s not these bandits in the northwest who are traditionally killing Christians. We see that more in the northeast and the central area of Nigeria.

J. Peter Pham:

That’s very much where the conflicts between farmer-herders, between Muslims or those motivated or agitated by extremist interpretations of Islam and Christians have occurred.

So I’m not privy to — I’m a former government official. I’m not privy to any current intelligence on this. So I can’t speak to why the targeting occurred in Sokoto. Certainly, it’s a mystery to me. There are a couple other places I would have picked to hit extremists in Nigeria.

Nick Schifrin:

So let’s drill into that.

What impact, if any, could this have, this strike in Northwest Nigeria, on violence against Christians?

J. Peter Pham:

As far as I’m aware of, a very limited impact. What does do is send a signal that the U.S. is willing to act in this area.

But what concerns me is the fact that all the reporting I have seen on this has emphasized — including Nigerian Foreign Minister Tuggar’s statements, this was coordinated with the Nigerian government. And I agree with my friend Nina Shea.

Part of the problem here is actually not all parts of the Nigerian government, but certain parts of the Nigerian government are suspect.

Nick Schifrin:

Well, we have also seen inability by the Nigerian government, as you were referencing before, to govern some of these spaces, whether the northwest, the northeast or some of these farmer-herder conflicts in the Central Plains.

I mean, how much of this is about — how much of the root causes is about the government not being able to have governance in these areas?

J. Peter Pham:

Yes it’s a matter of, where does something start and where something end? There’s certainly an incapacity or lack of capacity, but there’s also a lack of political will to put the resources necessary to that.

And in some cases — one has to be brutally honest here. There’s also certain politicians in Nigeria have their own agendas and their own political alliances with extremists. And you sort of get a mixture of all that. It’s a very complex situation that doesn’t give — lend itself to easy solutions.

Nick Schifrin:

Absolutely.

And so in that sense, is there anything the United States can do right now, whether with the military or not, that could actually help protect Nigerian Christians, could get at this lack of governance?

J. Peter Pham:

Well, first, I think calling attention to it is very, very important. Calling it out has forced the Nigerian government to take stock of what it is and is not doing. So that in itself is effective.

Secondly, I would say that important also in this is also to be — is operational security. Again, I’m not privy to current planning, but I certainly, if I were still in there, I’d be very, very hesitant at sharing and coordinating if — what the Nigerians are claiming is was happening with this coordination, I’d be very suspect about that.

Nick Schifrin:

And the Nigerian government, as we heard the foreign minister say, this violence is not about any particular religion, and, in fact, the majority of victims of violence in Nigeria are Muslim.

But we heard President Trump say this is about protecting Christians. So in the time we have left, about 30 seconds, do we know anything about why those two narratives are so different right now?

J. Peter Pham:

I think a lot of it has to do with it’s a matter of perspective. Both Muslims and Christians are suffering because of this violence. And where the political will is in this in Nigeria is the real question.

Is there political will to address the challenges to both communities, and is there a double agenda on the part of certain people?

Nick Schifrin:

Well, but, again, on the political will, it seems like so far, in the past, at least, the Nigerian government has struggled with that political will.

J. Peter Pham:

Very much so, both in will and in resources.

Nick Schifrin:

Ambassador Peter Pham, thank you very much.

J. Peter Pham:

Thank you.

Watch

Watch the Full Episode

PBS NewsHour from Dec 26, 2025

Related

Dec 26

Nigerian residents of Jabo are rattled after close U.S. airstrikes made their homes shake and the sky glow red

By Ope Adetayo, Tunde Omolehin, Associated Press

Dec 26

What to know about the Islamic State militants targeted by U.S. airstrikes in northwest Nigeria

By Chinedu Asadu, Associated Press

Dec 25

U.S. launches strikes against Islamic State forces in Nigeria, Trump says

By Will Weissert, Associated Press

Dec 23

Nigerians welcome release of 130 schoolchildren and teachers kidnapped from Catholic school

By Associated Press

Dec 03

Trump administration restricts visas for Nigerians involved in violence against Christians

By Dyepkazah Shibayan, Associated Press

Go Deeper

africa

donald trump news

islamic state

nigeria

u.s. military

By —

Nick Schifrin

Nick Schifrin is PBS NewsHour’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Correspondent. He leads NewsHour’s daily foreign coverage, including multiple trips to Ukraine since the full-scale invasion, and has created weeklong series for the NewsHour from nearly a dozen countries.

The PBS NewsHour series “Inside Putin’s Russia” won a 2017 Peabody Award and the National Press Club’s Edwin M. Hood Award for Diplomatic Correspondence. In 2020 Schifrin received the American Academy of Diplomacy’s Arthur Ross Media Award for Distinguished Reporting and Analysis of Foreign Affairs. He was a member of the NewsHour teams awarded a 2021 Peabody for coverage of COVID-19, and a 2023 duPont Columbia Award for coverage of Afghanistan and Ukraine.

Prior to PBS NewsHour, Schifrin was Al Jazeera America’s Middle East correspondent. He led the channel’s coverage of the 2014 war in Gaza; reported on the Syrian war from Syria’s Turkish, Lebanese and Jordanian borders; and covered the annexation of Crimea. He won an Overseas Press Club award for his Gaza coverage and a National Headliners Award for his Ukraine coverage.

From 2008-2012, Schifrin served as the ABC News correspondent in Afghanistan and Pakistan. In 2011 he was one of the first journalists to arrive in Abbottabad, Pakistan, after Osama bin Laden’s death and delivered one of the year’s biggest exclusives: the first video from inside bin Laden’s compound. His reporting helped ABC News win an Edward R. Murrow award for its bin Laden coverage.

Schifrin is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and a board member of the Overseas Press Club Foundation. He has a Bachelor’s degree from Columbia University and a Master of International Public Policy degree from the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS).

@nickschifrin

References

www.nbcnews.com

abcnews.go.com

Leave a Reply