In a significant development impacting collegiate sports eligibility, the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) has agreed to bar transgender athletes from competing in women’s sports. This decision stems from a federal civil rights investigation initiated under the Trump administration. The probe focused on potential violations related to Title IX, the landmark 1972 law prohibiting sex-based discrimination in federally funded education programs. Swimmer Lia Thomas’s participation on the Penn women’s team was a central element of this investigation.
The U.S. Department of Education announced the resolution agreement this week. Under the terms, UPenn will formally apologize to female athletes. It will also work to restore athletic titles and records. The Department of Education characterized certain past records as being “misappropriated by male athletes.” This marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing national debate surrounding transgender participation in competitive athletics.
Agreement Details and University Response
The agreement requires UPenn to update its athletic records from the 2021-22 season. These updates will indicate which athletes would hold records under eligibility guidelines based on biological sex. While the university committed to revising records, it did not explicitly confirm if Lia Thomas’s specific achievements would be erased. However, reports indicate the university will send apology letters specifically to female swimmers whose records or outcomes were affected by Thomas’s competition.
The Department of Education stated the agreement mandates UPenn adhere to “biology-based definitions” of male and female. This aligns with executive orders issued by former President Donald Trump. U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon hailed the outcome as an example of the “Trump effect.” She stated the university agreed to apologize for “past Title IX violations.” McMahon added that the resolution would ensure the protection of women’s sports for future generations.
UPenn acknowledged its previous policies followed the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) criteria at the time. Yet, the university recognized that “some student-athletes were disadvantaged by these rules.” A statement from UPenn’s website confirmed the university would apologize to those who experienced a competitive disadvantage or anxiety. This official apology acknowledges the negative impact on some athletes during the period in question.
The Context: Trump Administration Probes and Title IX
The federal investigation into UPenn was part of a broader initiative by the Trump administration. This effort targeted the inclusion of transgender athletes, particularly transgender women, in female sports categories. Days after signing an executive order aimed at this issue, the administration opened investigations into several universities. These probes alleged potential violations of Title IX. The University of Pennsylvania was among those scrutinized.
The administration’s focus on UPenn intensified. At one point, the Trump administration paused $175 million in federal funding to the university. This funding pause was directly linked to the dispute over its transgender athlete policy. The Department of Education has since signaled a return to enforcing Title IX protections based on biological sex. This recent agreement reinforces that position.
Lia Thomas: The Athlete at the Center of the Storm
Lia Thomas became a focal point in this debate after joining the UPenn women’s swim team. Originally from Austin, Texas, she competed on Penn’s men’s team for three seasons. She began hormone replacement therapy in May 2019. After transitioning, she joined the women’s team for the 2021-22 season. Her performance quickly drew national attention.
At the Zippy Invitational in December 2021, Thomas posted the nation’s fastest times in several events. She went on to win three titles at the 2022 Ivy League championships. There, she also set multiple program records. Her success culminated at the 2022 NCAA Division I Swimming and Diving Championships. She became the first openly transgender athlete to win a national college title, taking the 500-yard freestyle event. Thomas also tied for fifth place in the 200 freestyle with competitor Riley Gaines.
Thomas’s participation sparked controversy. While she stated her team was supportive, an anonymous letter from 16 Penn swimmers raised concerns. They felt her participation took away “competitive opportunities.” Despite the debate, Penn nominated her for NCAA Woman of the Year.
Thomas’s Perspective and Post-Penn Life
Lia Thomas has publicly addressed criticisms regarding her motivation for transitioning. In 2022 interviews, she stated her transition was for personal happiness. She aimed to be true to herself, not to gain an athletic advantage. Thomas also noted the small number of transgender college athletes, which the NCAA once estimated to be around ten.
Since graduating from UPenn, Thomas no longer competes for the university. She has reportedly pursued a law degree. Despite stepping away from collegiate competition, she sought to return to elite women’s sports. Last year, Thomas filed legal action with the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Switzerland. However, her case was rejected.
This legal setback followed a major policy change by the international swimming governing body, World Aquatics. In 2022, World Aquatics voted to ban transgender women from elite events. The ban applies if they have gone through any part of the male puberty process. Thomas publicly criticized this ruling as “devastating” and “detrimental to women’s sports.” She maintained that “Trans women are women.” Thomas continues to advocate for transgender athletes’ inclusion.
Athlete and Advocacy Reactions
The agreement has drawn strong reactions from different groups. Former UPenn swimmers have been vocal critics of the university’s previous policy. Paula Scanlan, a former teammate, expressed gratitude for the federal investigation. She shared her discomfort competing against and sharing a locker room with a transgender athlete she perceives as male. A lawsuit filed in February 2025 by three other former Penn women’s swimmers alleged university administrators misled players and pushed a “pro-trans ideology.” The suit also claimed administrators suggested players uncomfortable with Thomas needed counseling or a “Trans 101” talk.
Riley Gaines, who competed against Thomas at the 2022 NCAA championships, has become a prominent activist on this issue. She has filed her own lawsuit against the NCAA regarding its gender identity policies. Other women athletes have joined her legal challenge.
On the other hand, advocacy groups supporting LGBT rights have criticized the agreement. The Human Rights Campaign, a major U.S. lobbying group, issued a statement opposing the decision. A spokesman stated the administration seemed “obsessed with making young people’s lives harder.” The group framed the action as scapegoating transgender people to attack independent institutions.
Broader Implications
UPenn’s decision, prompted by the federal investigation, could have ripple effects. As an Ivy League institution, its policy changes following federal pressure may influence how other universities approach similar situations. The case reignites the national conversation on fairness, inclusion, and the interpretation of Title IX regarding gender identity in athletics.
The U.S. Department of Education’s enforcement action signals a clear return to interpreting Title IX based on biological sex distinctions in sports. This aligns with the Trump administration’s stated goal. The NCAA has indicated it may align its own policies with the new executive order. NCAA President Charlie Baker reportedly noted the order provides a “clear, national standard” that the organization would review.
The outcome at UPenn underscores the complex legal and social challenges surrounding transgender athlete participation. It highlights the tension between ensuring fair competition in women’s sports and promoting transgender inclusion.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did UPenn decide to ban transgender athletes from women’s sports?
UPenn’s decision came as an agreement to resolve a federal civil rights investigation by the U.S. Department of Education. The investigation, initiated under the Trump administration, examined the university’s policies and their compliance with Title IX, particularly in light of transgender swimmer Lia Thomas’s participation. The Department of Education concluded that the university’s previous policies violated the rights of female athletes, framing it as sex-based discrimination.
What does the UPenn agreement mean for past athletic records, specifically Lia Thomas’s?
Under the agreement, UPenn will update its athletic records from the 2021-22 season. The goal is to reflect who would hold records based on eligibility rules that define sexes by biology. While the university will amend records and apologize to affected female athletes, the agreement did not explicitly state whether Lia Thomas’s specific records would be erased. The Department of Education referred to this process as restoring titles and records “misappropriated by male athletes.”
How does this decision align with national policies on transgender athletes in sports?
This decision aligns with the Trump administration’s stance and recent actions by the U.S. Department of Education to enforce Title IX based on biological sex in sports. It follows President Trump’s executive order aimed at preventing transgender women from competing in female categories. Nationally, governing bodies like World Aquatics have also implemented bans based on male puberty. The NCAA is reviewing its own policies in light of the executive order, suggesting a potential broader shift towards sex-based eligibility criteria.
Conclusion
The University of Pennsylvania’s agreement to ban transgender athletes from women’s sports marks a significant outcome of the federal civil rights investigation linked to Lia Thomas. Under pressure from the U.S. Department of Education, the university will adopt biology-based eligibility rules, apologize to affected female athletes, and update records. This development reflects a concerted effort by the administration to reinterpret and enforce Title IX based on biological sex in athletics, positioning it as a measure to protect women’s sports. The decision adds another layer to the complex and ongoing debate over fairness, inclusion, and the future of transgender participation in competitive sports at all levels.
Word Count Check: 1198
