Thailand’s prime minister, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, faces a pivotal moment in her young premiership. The nation’s Constitutional court has ordered her immediate suspension from duty. This dramatic development follows intense scrutiny over a controversial, leaked phone conversation with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen. Critics argue the call breached ethical standards and undermined national interests, triggering a petition for her removal that the court is now reviewing.
The suspension plunges Thailand into fresh political uncertainty. It also highlights the recurring challenges faced by the powerful Shinawatra family in navigating the country’s complex political landscape. Paetongtarn, at 38, is Thailand’s youngest-ever Prime Minister, but her tenure, barely ten months in, is already facing significant headwinds, including a fragile ruling coalition and declining public approval.
Why the Suspension? A Closer Look at the Leaked Call
The source of the turmoil is a recorded phone conversation between Paetongtarn Shinawatra and Hun Sen, Cambodia’s former Prime Minister and current President of the Senate. The call reportedly took place on June 15, intended as a diplomatic effort to de-escalate tensions surrounding a recent border dispute. However, when the audio leaked, it ignited a firestorm of criticism.
During the call, Paetongtarn allegedly used the informal address “uncle” when speaking to the veteran Cambodian leader. More significantly, she reportedly made critical remarks about a senior Thai military commander. Accusations escalated when it was claimed she told Hun Sen she would “take care of it” if he needed anything.
Outrage and Accusations of Betrayal
The leaked recording sparked immediate and widespread outrage across Thailand. Many conservative lawmakers and members of the public accused the Prime Minister of excessive deference to Cambodia and failing to prioritize Thailand’s interests. Critics labeled her a “traitor” and a “sell out.” Protestors waving Thai flags reportedly chanted her nickname, “Ung Ing, step down,” demanding her resignation.
The controversy quickly led to formal action. A petition signed by 36 senators was filed with the Constitutional Court, alleging Paetongtarn had violated constitutional ethical standards through dishonesty. This petition prompted the court’s review and subsequent suspension order.
The Court’s Decision and Temporary Leadership
Thailand’s Constitutional Court judges voted unanimously to accept the petition for review. Following deliberation, they voted 7-2 in favor of immediately suspending Paetongtarn Shinawatra from her duties as Prime Minister while the case proceeds. The court has given her 15 days to formally submit her defense against the allegations.
During this suspension period, Deputy Prime Minister Suriya Juangroongruangkit, who also serves as Transport Minister, will step in as the caretaker Prime Minister. Notably, just hours before the court’s decision was endorsed, a cabinet reshuffle had taken place, prompted partly by a major coalition partner withdrawing support due to the fallout from the leaked call. In this reshuffle, Paetongtarn was assigned the additional role of Culture Minister. Reports indicate she will retain this cabinet position despite being suspended from the premiership.
Paetongtarn’s Defense and the Border Context
Addressing the controversy, Paetongtarn has publicly defended her actions. She stated her intention in the call with Hun Sen was “more than 100%… for the country.” She described her comments as a negotiating tactic aimed at preventing further conflict and protecting Thai soldiers and citizens near the border.
The border dispute between Thailand and Cambodia is a long-standing issue. Tensions recently flared again in late May following an armed confrontation that resulted in the death of a Cambodian soldier. This incident heightened nationalist sentiment on both sides, making diplomatic interactions highly sensitive. Paetongtarn apologized to those upset by the leaked conversation but maintained she had no ill intentions, suggesting that listening carefully to the full recording would reveal her purpose.
The Shinawatra Dynasty and Recurring Political Instability
Paetongtarn’s suspension is the latest chapter in a turbulent two-decade political saga centered around the Shinawatra family. This powerful clan has consistently won elections but has frequently seen its leaders removed from power through military coups or court interventions. Paetongtarn is the third member of her family to hold the prime ministership and now faces the risk of becoming the third to be ousted before completing a full term.
Her father, Thaksin Shinawatra, a billionaire former Prime Minister, was deposed by a military coup in 2006. Her aunt, Yingluck Shinawatra, also a former Prime Minister, was removed by a court ruling in 2014, an event swiftly followed by another military coup. Critics argue that the Constitutional Court and other unelected institutions in Thailand often act as defenders of the conservative royalist establishment, wielding significant power to destabilize or remove elected governments and political opponents.
The Powerful Role of Thailand’s Constitutional Court
The Constitutional Court’s decision underscores its profound influence on Thai politics. Experts note a pattern where courts play a significant role in removing elected officials or dissolving parties. Since 2006, the Constitutional Court has dissolved 34 political parties. This includes the reformist Move Forward party, which secured the most seats and votes in the 2023 general election but was ultimately blocked from forming a government by the establishment-aligned Senate and later dissolved by the court.
Political science lecturer Titipol Phakdeewanich described this as a part of “Thai political culture,” distinct from a true democratic process. While acknowledging the problematic nature of court-ordered suspensions, he suggested that public questioning of the PM’s actions based on the leaked call might lend a degree of perceived legitimacy to the court’s intervention for some.
Broader Pressures and Thaksin’s Own Legal Battle
Paetongtarn’s suspension occurs amid a backdrop of existing challenges for her government. Her ruling coalition holds a slim majority, further weakened by the recent departure of a key conservative ally. Her administration is also grappling with efforts to stimulate a sluggish economy. Public discontent has been reflected in a sharp decline in her approval rating, which plummeted from 30.9% in March to just 9.2% in a recent June poll.
Adding to the family’s woes, Paetongtarn’s father, Thaksin Shinawatra, is also facing significant legal troubles. On the same day as his daughter’s suspension, Thaksin appeared in court for the first hearing related to charges of insulting the monarchy. These charges stem from a 2015 interview. Facing potential penalties of up to 15 years under Thailand’s strict lese-majeste law, Thaksin denies the charges and asserts his loyalty. His return to Thailand in 2023 after 15 years of self-imposed exile was part of a complex political bargain.
This interlocking web of legal challenges, family history, and institutional power struggles defines the current political climate in Thailand. The outcome of the ethics case against Paetongtarn Shinawatra will have significant implications for her future, the stability of her government, and the ongoing trajectory of Thai democracy.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra suspended?
Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra was suspended by Thailand’s Constitutional Court pending an ethics investigation. This probe stems from a leaked phone conversation with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen, which critics argued violated ethical standards. A petition by 36 senators alleged dishonesty and a breach of the constitution regarding this call.
Who is serving as acting Prime Minister during Paetongtarn’s suspension?
During Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra’s suspension, Deputy Prime Minister Suriya Juangroongruangkit is serving as the caretaker Prime Minister of Thailand. The Constitutional Court ordered the suspension while it considers the petition for her full dismissal, granting her 15 days to submit her defense.
What is the significance of the Constitutional Court in Thai politics?
Thailand’s Constitutional Court holds substantial power in shaping political outcomes. It has a history of intervening in elected governments, including dissolving numerous political parties (34 since 2006) and removing prime ministers. Critics argue its decisions often align with the interests of the conservative establishment, impacting the stability and democratic process in the country.
*
The situation remains fluid as the Constitutional Court proceeds with its review of the case against Paetongtarn Shinawatra. The coming weeks, as she prepares her defense, will be critical in determining the future of her premiership and the stability of Thailand’s government.
